CO129-132 - Sir MacDonnell - 1868 [8-9] — Page 643

637

2:33

کرتی

#1

Jounal Chane: p. 110 that notice by

ફર્મે

Campany

to take land under their

compulsory powers, and the subsequent

fixing of the pen chase and comprensation

money by arbitration, tagulas

A

to geshor

carstitute

contract for sale and purchase),

which the Court will enforce at the

#

sistance of the vendor. We says: " the

"Master of the Rolls had fist the maller

"

An

The

do

right grounds

in the Reguito

"Canal Company & War; after notice

and the price fixed, the relation

given

vendor and

of the parties, as vendos

was

A.A

case)

16.

fully constituted)

as

purchaser,

in the

of a formal and regular agreement." Perhaps havwer, of all the

which I have cited, the me

»

with which I shall

list

may

plete the

be recognized by this

Excellamy

as the most

er

andusive,

namely:- The Misti-politan Railway

ت

Company v. Woodhouse decided) in 1865- by Stuart V.C. who at the mistance of a railway

paited

ANV

injunction,

pany

Con

to restrain a landowner from selling property comprised in a notice to treat for the purchase there of served) uper him by the Company

Itirait V.C.

༧༩་1༧ .

#

"I think the

"auctiority quoted by Mr. Dave (Haynes

I D.

"1

"v. Magnes 30 Law Jour:

ence

"decisive of the question. Vice Chancellor

"Kindersley, in the cave referred

referred to,

"ditiough he makes use

of

Jane)